Relative Fenwick per Salary Band Over Time Masterpost (Defense)

Just yesterday I published a set of charts showing scoring chances relative over time for the forwards, and now I have a similar set for defenders. These charts show Fenwick For % Relative to a player’s team, but show the change over time per salary band.

Why Fenwick? Well, by removing blocked shots from the analysis, we can get a better idea of how good the defender is at shot suppression. If they’re blocking shots (as shown by Corsi) then they’re letting the opposing team get into a shooting lane with the puck, and that’s less than ideal.

The most important thing to know when reading these charts is that a higher Fenwick For % Relative is better, just like a higher Scoring Chance For % Relative is better for forwards. And if your team isn’t positive, you’ll want them to at least be higher than the league average.

Here are the NHL Averages:

All NHL FF Rel Over Time - D

Other than the <$0.6m and $4-5m band you can see a pretty clear trend that more recent signings have had better FF% Rel than in years past. I would suspect the reason that the $4-5m band took a hit with several UFAs moving into higher price ranges, however it could be the opposite – UFAs from the $2-4m bands moving up a level undeservedly due to cap inflation.

Again, I didn’t include Zone Starts in these graphs, partially because of this article challenging their usefulness on an aggregate level. (The larger reason is because it looked gross, and vanity couldn’t allow me to put out ugly charts.)

While there may be a trend on the NHL level, I’m seeing a lot of variance on a team level. This could be due to the small amount of data on a team level – even though the minimum was only 500+ minutes per season (all situations), most years you won’t get more than 7 defenders per team, which means around 14 salary data points per timeframe.

The other theory is that it’s due in large part to the very reactionary nature of GM & coach hiring and firing – a lot of teams have coach or GM (or both) turnover every few years, which makes it hard to establish a pattern of behavior over time.

As usual, I caution you against using these as a bar of what a defender “should” get paid on a contract, though it can definitely point you in the right direction when looking for comparables. Also, relative metrics don’t always translate from team to team – someone great on the Leafs, who have an overall very low Fenwick For %, could be completely negative on the Blackhawks, who historically have a high Fenwick For %.

Still, some of unaswered questions here:

1) WHEN WILL YOU LOOK AT UFA/RFA CONTRACTS?
2) How is all of this affected by quality of teammates? What about Quality of Competition?

Great questions guys. I’ll get back to you on that.

Anyway, here are all 30 NHL teams, in alphabetical order, presented without comment.

Anaheim

ANA FF Rel Over Time - D

Arizona (includes time spent as Phoenix)

ARI FF Rel Over Time - D

Boston

BOS FF Rel Over Time - D

Buffalo

BUF FF Rel Over Time - D

Calgary

CGY FF Rel Over Time - DCarolina

CAR FF Rel Over Time - D

Chicago

CHI FF Rel Over Time - D

Colorado

COL FF Rel Over Time - D

Columbus

CBJ FF Rel Over Time - D

Dallas

DAL FF Rel Over Time - D

Detroit

DET FF Rel Over Time - D

Edmonton

EDM FF Rel Over Time - D

Florida

FLA FF Rel Over Time - D

Los Angeles

LA FF Rel Over Time - D

Minnesota

MIN FF Rel Over Time - D

Montreal

MTL FF Rel Over Time - D

Nashville

NSH FF Rel Over Time - D

New Jersey

NJ FF Rel Over Time - D

New York Islanders

NYI FF Rel Over Time - D

New York Rangers

NYR FF Rel Over Time - D

Ottawa

OTT FF Rel Over Time - D

Philadelphia

PHI FF Rel Over Time - D

Pittsburgh

PIT FF Rel Over Time - D

San Jose

SJ FF Rel Over Time - D

St Louis

STL FF Rel Over Time - D

Tampa Bay

TB FF Rel Over Time - D

Toronto

TOR FF Rel Over Time - D

Vancouver

VAN FF Rel Over Time - D

Washington

WSH FF Rel Over Time - D

Winnipeg (includes time spent as Atlanta)

WPG FF Rel Over Time - D

Older Posts:

Salary Bands by Possession & Usage (Forwards)
Salary Bands by Possession & Usage (Defenders)
Salary Bands by Scoring Chances Rel Over Time (Forwards)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s